Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - JBH

Pages: [1]
I wonder about the Showdown Staredown

If I roll 10+ and you roll a miss, does that mean that I pick 3? Or that I pick 2 for myself and 1 for you?

If it is the second, I'd suggest to reformulate the first choice as:

• You delay your draw so the other go for their gun first (allowing you to claim self-defense).

Just because I find it weird that I might decide that you "force" me to go first.

The way I see it, you pick 3: two for the 10+ and one for the other missing.

Happy it seems to make sense. I've promoted the changes into v4, which is now up. Thanks !

Very good feedback. Thanks, guys.
Regarding Augury, I agree it would need to be replaced by another custom move, but for the time being I'm just going to remove it. I'm however considering bringing Insight back in (as it would fit fine here) and rename the last Native move to Vision Quest, using it.

Vision Quest: some component of your sacred ground, or some arrangement of its components, is uniquely receptive to the land (add insight). Choose and name it, or else leave it for the MC to reveal during play.

I've been rethinking about the Showdown move upon the comments and I'm considering moving the draw&shoot to the Staredown phase, so it doesn't mean it automatically hits. Here is how it may work:

When you face off with someone in a gunfight duel, roll+cool to engage in a stare down contest. In PvP both roll+cool, choosing secretly from one another (contradicting choices cancel out). On a 10+, choose 2. On a 7-9, choose 1. On a miss, the other chooses 1 against you.
• You force the other to go for their gun first (so you can claim self-defense).
• You draw and shoot first in the shootout (before exchanging harm).
• You take +1 forward.

When the stare down is resolved, proceed to the shootout: exchange harm, but first roll+hard. In PvP both roll+hard, choosing secretly from one another (contradicting choices cancel out). On a 10+, choose 2. On a 7-9, choose 1. On a miss, the other chooses 1 against you.
• You inflict terrible harm (+1harm).
• You suffer little harm (-1harm).
• You disarm the other, but inflict little harm (-1harm).

Regarding the formatting of the playbooks, it is just a Word doc exported to pdf (sorry to disappoint :-)). I use the Playbill font for titles and Modern No. 20 for body of text.

A few comments:

* The AW rules are built so that your Weird is always increasing, far more so than the other stats. You've changed Weird to Wild - a nice change! - but is it appropriate to a Western that the endgame has everyone becoming more and more Wild?

* It might be nice to have some kind of Animal Handling move based on Wild, as well. (For horse taming, standing down a bear, etc.) "Tame the Beast", perhaps? I don't know if it should be a Basic Move, but it would give another interesting use for Wild (I could even see using it to deal with someone hopelessly drunk, for example!).

* I agree that the Showdown move is very interesting - and I like how you've broken it down into two segments of action - but I'm not sure what the options are for. Is drawing first all about looking calmer than the other guy? What about shooting first? Is it just narrative colour, or does it change the outcome of the showdown? (For example, if I "shoot first" and I "disarm" my opponent, do I still exchange harm?)

* Also, I'm not sure what augury does, if there's no psychic maelstrom!

Good points. Thanks.

Regarding characters becoming more 'Wild' as they go on, it kind of makes sense to me (it is the Wild West after all :)). However I'm wondering if there need to be a custom move based on 'Wild' that allows to accomplish astonishing feats, at a cost.

Animal handling: yes, I thought about it, but then didn't want to add too much over the AW framework (also considering it already provide moves for mounted combat). However if you have idea for animal handling moves that can be cool.

Showdowns: pulling first is a bad as that technically makes your a murderer (while the other would be just firing in self defense). Shooting first is important as it may prevent the other from firing altogether (if killed or disarmed).

Augury: you are right, it is just a leftover from AW that I need to amend. However it may make sense for someone like the Native to be able to perform Augury in some cases (like in a spirit quest).

Glad you are liking it. I tried to go as light as possible with the reskin here, as I though there was already a western within AW: it just needed a little spin to come through. We have finished our run with it and it went quite well, definitely above expectations.
I see your point about the Showdown move. I think we agree this needs to involve both Cool and Hard. Either ways work. This was a tough move to pull together in a way that would work both for dueling with NPC and in PVP - hope I managed to. So far we only had one in real play and the player rolled two 12s in a row, so well, not much for anecdotal evidence (but it was fun :-)).

v3 is up with tweaked Go Trailblazing move and reworked Showdown move.

v2 is up with a couple of fixes for a Doc move (Healing Touch) and a Gunslinger move (Battle Instinct), which both had too much AW left into them.

I've put together this hack, based on AW2 preview material, for running a spaghetti western game with my group. It is a quick&dirty thing, meant for private use only, but it should be usable (as it is mostly a straight AW2 ripoff, which seems naturally well suited to western from the get going).
The main changes are renaming of archetypes, some tweaks to them, the Weird stat replaced by Wild and a couple of custom moves for wilderness exploration and showdowns.

I don't know if this is the right section in the forum for this, by the way. If not, feel free to move it elsewhere, please.

the nerve core / Re: welcome & ground rules
« on: September 16, 2016, 07:47:32 AM »
Dumb question: how do I get permission to create a new thread? I'm not seeing a button for that. Do I need a minimum number of replies posted before it becomes available?

Ignore this: it looks like I just needed one post and going through the spam filter once.

Pages: [1]