318
« on: June 26, 2010, 12:57:46 AM »
So how about a theoretical move like this:
{When you have to make an impossible choice between two things, roll +?. "Impossible choice" here means if you take one of those things, you cannot get the other, no way, no how.
On a 10+ you get both, somehow.
On a 7-9, the MC will name some unforseen price. You can pay the price and get both, or not pay it and get only one.
On 6 or less, you get neither, not even the one you could've had. Tough luck.}
So, this move has no character-based conflict of interest. Not between characters; maybe it's a conflict of interest for a single character, sure.
So how does this reflect in to what you said above? And generally, what are people's opinions of the above move, for curiousity.