From level 2-5, you get to choose an advanced move from the level 2-5 list. From level 6-10, you get to choose from the level 6-10 moves or the 2-5 moves, your call. See for example the Bard: In the pre-release pdf, the level 2-5 moves start at the top of p. 77, while the 6-10 moves start about midway through p. 78 (beginning with Healing Chorus).

Ahh, okay, gotcha. Yeah, I was a hardcover level DW backer, but missed the Kickstarter for WDR. Just worried there was a missing e-mail out there somewhere. Thanks!

"Yep. That's the Apocalypse Dragon. What do you do?"

... What? :-)

Rotes are spells just like any other, they just don't use up your "level + 1" spell slots.

Remember also that, rote or not, as long as the cleric never chooses the "lose the spell" option on a 7-9 hit and as long as the GM doesn't decide to have him lose the spell on a miss (use up their resources), the cleric can already go from person to person casting CLW after the fight.

I would say 6-10.

It sounds cool, but it's a sort of zero-sum move.  I mean, this move adds nothing to the game; instead, it just flats out what could make ad opponent different from the others.

Well, the idea was to strengthen the fighter's niche as the ultimate combat badass who can kill damn near anything you put in front of him and not reduce him to a support role when the party is fighting the Dread Spectral King or some such critter. Maybe it's just because I've been reading the D&D 5E playtest stuff and that's got me paranoid about situations where the fighter has to play babysitter while the wizard magics the monster to death because the fiction dictates that hitting it with a sword doesn't hurt it.

However, all that being said, I just found the mention in the equipment chapter that "the fighter's signature weapon is never considered mundane," so yeah, the move probably isn't actually necessary. Probably a good idea to mention that in the fighter section directly, since previously we'd been told that unless an item says otherwise, it's mundane.

I'll send Sage an e-mail, unfortunately for the time being, my only feedback is "You shouldn't let players drink during Luke's erotically charged sexventures, maybe take that ability out of the final release."

Do that.

Then post the AP behind this story. I must know.

Nitpick: The attribution for your quote should be "Pulp Fiction," because that's not Ezekiel 25:17. Otherwise, seems appropriate.