OK, so I'm having some trouble finding the balance between being a fan of the characters and springing sudden unhappy revelations on them.
For example, let's say the PC Goldie has just gotten his hands on a working radio set--something he's been after for a while. Of course, he gets jacked by Junker's gang on the way back to the hardhold, and now he's holding the radio while Junker has him at gunpoint. The player reads the sitch, and asks for his best escape route.
First thing that comes to mind? "Well, you could throw the radio at him and run. He'd have to choose between shooting you and catching the radio, and he'd probably choose the radio." That's an unhappy revelation, just like the book calls for.
But then I think: getting the radio was a success, and I'm supposed to let the PCs have their successes, right? It's also cool stuff, and I'm not supposed to take away their cool stuff. So is it OK to threaten the radio? And if not, what would be a better unhappy revelation (as an example)?
A related question... When the PCs have connections with NPCs, fuckery is easy: set up an NPC-PC-NPC triangle and let rip. But one of my players is playing a Savvyhead whose most meaningful relationships are with his stuff--electronics, machines, etc.; it's all very detailed, and very much a part of his character. I'm having trouble figuring out how to make the character's life interesting without fucking with his cool stuff. I can't just say, "you get back to your workshop, and your EKG machine is gone--nothing but stripped wires sticking out where it used to be attached," right? Should I bring in an NPC, just to be an intermediary: "you get back to your workshop, and Dog Head's there trying his best to jimmy the EKG out of it's rack. What do you do?" Is that too much of an agenda, creating problems for the PC just to give them something to fight against?