Single Combat -vs- a gang ?

  • 2 Replies
  • 2546 Views
Single Combat -vs- a gang ?
« on: August 07, 2016, 07:36:08 PM »
Just two doubts I'm having...

1)
If a PC is facing off against a bunch of enemies... is it still "single combat"?
I would say YES, you have one PC against one gang.
If the PC had allies of any kind that would then become A Chaotic Free-For-All.

Do you agree?

Can anyone confirm?

*

lumpley

  • 1293
Re: Single Combat -vs- a gang ?
« Reply #1 on: August 08, 2016, 08:39:48 AM »
Single combat is for when there are two combatants or two sides - one character against another, one gang against another, or, sure, a PC vs a gang - but nobody is fighting for anything except the fight. If either side has an objective other than to straight-up murderize the other side, use the seize & hold moves instead. Single combat is for formal, scheduled fights on neutral ground, like duels, bouts, cage fights, and Gangs of New York.

The chaotic free-for-all is for when there aren't sides, just everyone out for themselves, or for when there are so many sides that they break down completely as soon as bullets start flying. It's for when a mob turns its violence inward instead of outward.

The general rule is, unless you're absolutely certain it's single combat or a chaotic free-for-all, you should probably use the seize & hold moves instead.

-Vincent


Re: Single Combat -vs- a gang ?
« Reply #2 on: August 08, 2016, 10:59:55 AM »
Thanks, this is a very important clarification :)

EDIT:
I had a doubt regarding what happens if one side wants murder and the other side has other aims... but running through the fiction to ask a better question I ended up answering to myself :D
« Last Edit: August 08, 2016, 11:10:48 AM by Hasimir »