It is definitely doable, just not entirely straightforward since the monsters are not completely encapsulated. Take the following example:

<p aid:pstyle="MonsterName">Goblin Orkaster   <span aid:cstyle="Tags">Solitary, Small, Magical, Intelligent, Organized</span></p>
<p aid:pstyle="MonsterStats">Acid orb (d10+1 damage ignores armor)   12 HP   0 Armor</p>
<p aid:pstyle="MonsterStats"><span aid:cstyle="Tags">Near, Far</span></p>
<p aid:pstyle="MonsterDescription">Oh lord, who taught them magic? <em>Instinct</em>: To tap power beyond their stature</p>
<ul><li>Unleash a poorly understood spell</li>
<li>Pour forth magical chaos</li>
<li>Use other goblins for shields</li></ul>

The Goblin is missing a "<monster />" wrapper that would make parsing simpler, And, while name, stats, tags, and description are encapsulated, moves are not.

Alright, I just did a new build based on the latest source, I also changed the following:

• Table formatting in character creation
• Clearer monster tag presentation
• Clearer spell tag presentation

@kallisti_dk, absolutely, I'm also planning on adding another PDF with the Open-Dyslexic font

This seems like a completely alien concept to me. I usually have the opposite problem, where dice are slamming into the table and I have no idea why (players rolling for moves rather than engaging the fiction).

I would recommend that you call for moves/rolls when players do things that would trigger the action, as it is a powerful pacing mechanism, and  to signal to the players when they need to engage the mechanics. So, if the wizard says, "I cast magic missile," I would respond, "so, you're casting a spell?" or "roll+int."

It sounds like what you want is for the player to say "I cast magic missile" and then immediately roll on their own. If they do that, they are skipping stakes/move negotiation. This usually isn't as much of an issue with the above example, but I frequently run into the situation of "I swing my sword at it," and the player rolling for hack and slash, but I would call for defy danger, because simply swinging their sword at the thing wouldn't trigger hack and slash.

Sorry for the double post.

On "Character Creation", 6. Figure Out Modifiers - something went wrong with the modifiers list, which shows:

Quote

ScoreModifier1-3-34-5-26-8-19-11012-15+116-17+218+3

You are absolutely correct, I forgot to put the indesign => xhtml table transmogrifier in the new build script. I'll get that fixed in the next revision.

I know I've seen various peoples post custom builds from the source over on github. And, with the pre-release version I cleaned up my generator and posted it online. Hopefully my scripts will prove helpful for others generating their own builds.

The source is hosted here:

https://github.com/jjafuller/dungeon-world-custom-build

And the output can be viewed here:

http://book.dwgazetteer.com/

Ultimately you would be doing something that is not covered in the rules, so it would be up to the table you were playing with. I could see this working for a fighter where you say his signature weapon is a pairs of long swords, so you would be able to obtain additional benefit that way.

As written, I would say the assumption is that most classes are not trained to use more than one weapon at once, so they would not gain the benefit from both. Or, more realistically, you might actually suffer a penalty due to the cumbersome nature of duel wielding.