1
Apocalypse World / Re: Disciplined Engagement - Quarantine
« on: March 01, 2017, 04:34:44 PM »
Thanks guys!
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Pages: [1]
2
Apocalypse World / Re: Disciplined Engagement - Quarantine
« on: March 01, 2017, 03:40:13 PM »
Got it.
So, if he throws a bomb in a closed place full of people, he also cant control the inflicted harm? The action of causing harm (shooting somebody) has to be reversible to an action where you do not cause harm in roleplay (you shoot next to your victim, without doing harm)?
So, if he throws a bomb in a closed place full of people, he also cant control the inflicted harm? The action of causing harm (shooting somebody) has to be reversible to an action where you do not cause harm in roleplay (you shoot next to your victim, without doing harm)?
3
Apocalypse World / Disciplined Engagement - Quarantine
« on: March 01, 2017, 02:43:55 PM »
Hello!
Im having trouble trying to interpretate this move from the Quarantine:
Disciplined engagement: when you inflict harm, you can choose to inflict any amount of harm you like, less than or up to your harm as established, including s-harm. Decide at the moment you inflict the harm; you need not tell anyone in advance how much harm you intend to inflict
In our last adventure, the Gunlugger lvls up and takes this move from the Quarantine playbook. Now he's on the loose mutilating people without causing any harm. I was drunk (in real life) and not expecting this sort of shit, so ive just let it happen. But on the next day i realised that something has to be wrong with you chopping your friends hand and cutting off their cheeks without the victim suffering any harm. On the other hand, this is exactly what the move does. I can go with "you shoot the bastard with your rifle, and the bullet barely touches the skull, and the victim takes 0 harm", but "i want to cut all the five members of his body and turn him into a turtoise, without him taking any damage" seems a little too much.
What do you guys think?
Im having trouble trying to interpretate this move from the Quarantine:
Disciplined engagement: when you inflict harm, you can choose to inflict any amount of harm you like, less than or up to your harm as established, including s-harm. Decide at the moment you inflict the harm; you need not tell anyone in advance how much harm you intend to inflict
In our last adventure, the Gunlugger lvls up and takes this move from the Quarantine playbook. Now he's on the loose mutilating people without causing any harm. I was drunk (in real life) and not expecting this sort of shit, so ive just let it happen. But on the next day i realised that something has to be wrong with you chopping your friends hand and cutting off their cheeks without the victim suffering any harm. On the other hand, this is exactly what the move does. I can go with "you shoot the bastard with your rifle, and the bullet barely touches the skull, and the victim takes 0 harm", but "i want to cut all the five members of his body and turn him into a turtoise, without him taking any damage" seems a little too much.
What do you guys think?
Pages: [1]